AJIO Activewear August 2026: The Listings That Name a Spec

Four hundred and ninety-nine rupees, seventeen per cent off a stated Rs. 599. We open the page here because of what the title does rather than what the garment is. Of the 395 activewear listings we counted on AJIO's search grid on August 3, only 33 name a performance property of any kind, and this is one of them: the words low support are printed on the grid, so you know before you click that this is a bra for yoga, walking, weights and stretching, and not for running. That single word is the specification the entire category turns on. A bra sized and constructed for low impact will not do the job in a high-impact session, and no amount of price comparison substitutes for knowing which one you are buying. Seventeen per cent is a shallow badge by this rack's standards, where the median across all 395 listings is sixty per cent, and that is the pattern this whole page is about: the listings that state a spec carry the smallest discounts. We have not worn this or any other garment here, we cannot tell you how it fits, and AJIO's search response returned no rating and no review count for it. What we can tell you is that it says what it is for, which most of this catalogue does not.

• Price: Rs. 499 (stated MRP Rs. 599)
• Key detail: One of 20 sports bras in the pull whose title states a support or impact level - here, low support
• Discount: 17% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 100
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Best cheap low-impact bra
• Buying logic: the spec is in the title

One thousand three hundred and ninety-nine rupees, thirteen per cent off a stated Rs. 1,599. It is the most expensive sports bra we have seated and it carries the smallest percentage of any bra in this read, which is exactly the relationship worth internalising before you scroll a sale page. Across the 395 listings we pulled, the 33 that name a performance property have a median discount of forty per cent; the other 362 have a median of sixty. Only three of the 33 are at seventy per cent or more, against 112 of the rest. So on this rack, a small badge is weakly correlated with a listing that tells you something, and a very large badge is correlated with a listing that tells you nothing but the neckline. That is a description of AJIO's activewear grid on one day and not an accusation about any brand. The stated support in the title is the reason this is here at Rs. 1,399 rather than something cheaper: it says what it is for. A Rs. 200 gap between a Rs. 1,599 claim and a Rs. 1,399 price is also a far more ordinary-looking number than a Rs. 1,300 gap, which is the sort of thing worth weighing when you decide whether a stated MRP means anything. We have not worn it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 1,399 (stated MRP Rs. 1,599)
• Key detail: Rs. 1,399 at 13% off - the shallowest badge on any bra in this read
• Discount: 13% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 200
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The dearest bra, the shallowest badge
• Buying logic: small badge, stated spec

Four hundred and sixty-eight rupees, sixty-one per cent off a stated Rs. 1,199. Of the 65 sports bra listings in this pull, twenty state a support or impact level and this is the cheapest of the medium-impact ones. Medium impact is the middle rung of the three-step convention the category runs on - low for yoga and walking, medium for cycling, hiking and gym work, high for running and court sports - and it is the rung most people who exercise a few times a week actually need. The title also states non-wired and padded, which between them describe the construction well enough for you to know roughly what you are getting. Clovia has four sports bras in this pull and all four state a medium impact level, which makes it the most consistent brand on this measure after Decathlon. Sixty-one per cent off is a middling badge here rather than a remarkable one, and the stated Rs. 1,199 is a number shared by other listings in the pull, so we would treat the Rs. 468 as the price and the Rs. 1,199 as a reference figure. Fit, band sizing and how the padding behaves after a few washes are exactly what a search feed cannot tell you, and we have not worn this. AJIO returned no rating and no review count for it.

• Price: Rs. 468 (stated MRP Rs. 1,199)
• Key detail: Rs. 468 - the cheapest listing here that states a medium impact rating
• Discount: 61% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 731
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Best medium impact under Rs. 500
• Buying logic: the middle rung, stated

Three hundred and sixty-three rupees, seventy per cent off a stated Rs. 1,209, and it is the cheapest listing anywhere in this pull whose title states high impact. That matters more than the discount does. High impact is the rating that applies to running, skipping, court sports and anything with both feet leaving the ground, and it is the one situation where getting the level wrong is uncomfortable rather than merely suboptimal. The title also states a cross back and a back closure, which is a genuinely useful pair of details on a grid where most listings state only a print. It is one of just three of the 33 spec-naming listings that sits at seventy per cent off or more, which makes it the rare card on this page where a deep badge and a printed specification arrive together. We are not in a position to say whether the high impact claim is borne out, because we have not worn it and AJIO's search response carries no rating and no review count for this or any of the other 394 listings we pulled. Nor have we opened the product page - our count is of what the grid shows. If you are buying to run in, our advice is to treat the stated level as a filter and the fit as something you confirm on arrival.

• Price: Rs. 363 (stated MRP Rs. 1,209)
• Key detail: Rs. 363 - the cheapest listing in the whole pull that states high impact
• Discount: 70% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 846
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Cheapest stated high impact
• Buying logic: deep badge, stated spec

One thousand two hundred and fifty rupees, fifty per cent off a stated Rs. 2,499 - a badge that is exactly half, off an MRP that is exactly double, which is worth noticing on a rack where twenty listings share the stated figure Rs. 2,499. The title states high impact, support and a front zip, which is three useful facts on a grid where the median listing offers none. The front zip is the detail we would pay for. Getting into and out of a high-impact bra is the practical complaint people have about the category, and a zip addresses it directly. Puma has nine sports bras in this pull and four of them state an impact level - high or mid - which puts it ahead of the rack as a whole, where only twenty of 65 bras say anything. At Rs. 1,250 it is nearly three and a half times the Rs. 363 Amante listing above, and both say high impact, so the honest framing is that you are paying for the closure, the brand and whatever construction differences exist behind two titles that read similarly. We have not worn either and cannot adjudicate between them. AJIO's feed returned no rating and no review count for either listing, and the fifty per cent badge is off a figure we have no way to verify.

• Price: Rs. 1,250 (stated MRP Rs. 2,499)
• Key detail: Rs. 1,250 - high impact plus a front zip, the dearest stated-impact bra we seated
• Discount: 50% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 1,249
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: High impact with a front zip
• Buying logic: paying for the closure

Two hundred and ninety-six rupees, eighty-one per cent off a stated Rs. 1,599. We have seated it deliberately as the counterexample, not as a warning: there is nothing wrong with a Rs. 296 sports bra and plenty of people will be perfectly happy with one. The point is what the grid gives you to decide on. The title states a brand, a coverage style and nothing else - no impact rating, no fabric, no closure, no support level - so the only differentiating facts AJIO shows you before you click are the price and the eighty-one per cent. Compare that with the Rs. 363 Amante listing two cards up, which for sixty-seven rupees more states high impact, a cross back and a back closure. In a category where the specification is the whole decision, sixty-seven rupees for knowing what you are buying looks like the better spend. Two BlueFicus listings in this pull are eighty-one per cent off the same Rs. 1,599 and a third is seventy-seven per cent off Rs. 1,299, all landing within three rupees of each other at Rs. 296 to Rs. 299. When several listings share an MRP and converge on one selling price, the selling price is the fact and the MRP is the reference. We have not worn it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 296 (stated MRP Rs. 1,599)
• Key detail: 81% off Rs. 1,599 and no impact level, fabric or closure stated in the title
• Discount: 81% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 1,303
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The 81 per cent that says nothing
• Buying logic: badge without a spec

One thousand six hundred and ninety-nine rupees, twenty-eight per cent off a stated Rs. 2,349. Here is the number that made this chapter: we pulled 74 women's running shoe listings and exactly two of them say anything about how the shoe behaves. Both are Decathlon, both use the word cushioned, and this is the cheaper. Every other listing in those 74 is described as low-top, lace-up, round-toe, knitted, mesh or colourblock - which are shapes and materials, not running properties. Cushioning is not a complete spec either. It does not tell you the stack height, the drop or the intended weekly mileage, all of which a serious runner would want. But it is a claim about the function of the shoe rather than its silhouette, and on this grid that puts it in a group of two out of 74. Twenty-eight per cent off is a shallow badge on a rack where seventeen RED TAPE listings sit at eighty to eighty-six per cent, and that inversion is the argument this page keeps making. We have not run in this or in anything else here, AJIO returned no rating and no review count for it, and fit, width and how a midsole holds up over a few hundred kilometres are exactly what a price feed cannot establish.

• Price: Rs. 1,699 (stated MRP Rs. 2,349)
• Key detail: Rs. 1,699 - one of only two women's running shoes in 74 whose title says cushioned
• Discount: 28% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 650
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Cheapest shoe that says cushioned
• Buying logic: two shoes in 74 say it

Two thousand four hundred and ninety-nine rupees, twenty-six per cent off a stated Rs. 3,399. This is the second of the two women's running shoes in 74 whose title states cushioning, and the eight hundred rupee gap between it and the Jogflow 100.1 in the previous card is one of the few upgrade decisions on this page that a shopper can even frame, because both listings describe the same property. Elsewhere in this chapter you are comparing a low-top against a mesh upper against a round toe, which is not a comparison at all. What the grid does not tell you is what the extra Rs. 800 buys in cushioning terms - more foam, different foam, a different geometry - and we are not going to guess. Decathlon runs several sub-brands and this is the Kiprun line against the Kalenji one below; the number in the name, 190.1 against 100.1, is the store's own model coding rather than a specification we can interpret for you. Twenty-six per cent is the second-shallowest badge in this chapter. Decathlon has fifteen listings across the whole pull and its deepest discount is sixty-five per cent, with most between thirteen and thirty-seven, so it is the brand least likely to show you a large percentage and most likely to tell you what the product does. We have not run in it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 2,499 (stated MRP Rs. 3,399)
• Key detail: Rs. 2,499 - the other cushioned listing, Rs. 800 above the 100.1
• Discount: 26% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 900
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The step up, stated
• Buying logic: the upgrade you can frame

One thousand one hundred and six rupees, eighty-six per cent off a stated Rs. 7,899. RED TAPE has seventeen shoe listings in this pull and every one of them is between eighty and eighty-six per cent off, off stated MRPs ranging from Rs. 5,799 to Rs. 9,399, and all seventeen land between Rs. 812 and Rs. 1,488. That is the fact worth carrying away: a rack of seventeen shoes whose claimed list prices span three and a half thousand rupees but whose actual prices span six hundred and seventy-six. When the sale prices cluster that tightly under MRPs that vary that widely, the sale price is the price and the MRP is doing something else. We are describing the arithmetic in AJIO's own feed and alleging nothing beyond it. The title of this listing states low-top, lace-up and running - a shape, a fastening and a category. It does not state cushioning, drop, weight, upper material or intended use, and neither does any of the other sixteen. If Rs. 1,106 is what you want to spend on a running shoe, that is a reasonable budget and there are several here at it. Just do not let the number eighty-six do any of the deciding. We have not worn it and AJIO returned no rating or review count.

• Price: Rs. 1,106 (stated MRP Rs. 7,899)
• Key detail: 86% off a stated Rs. 7,899 - one of 17 RED TAPE shoe listings at 80-86% off in this pull
• Discount: 86% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 6,793
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The deepest badge in the rack
• Buying logic: the badge is not the spec

Four thousand four hundred and six rupees, ten per cent off a stated Rs. 4,895 - the shallowest badge in this chapter and one of the shallowest in the whole pull. The title states no performance property either, which is worth being straight about: Downshifter 14 and Road Running are a model name and a surface, not a spec. But a model name is a different kind of information from a shape. Nike publishes its own material on the Downshifter line, independent reviews of it exist, and a shopper who wants to know what the shoe is can go and find out, which is not true of a listing described only as low-top with a mesh upper. That is the honest case for paying four times the RED TAPE price here: not that the grid tells you more, but that the name gives you something to research. Three Nike women's listings appear in this pull - the Downshifter 14 at Rs. 4,406, the Revolution 8 at Rs. 3,866 and the Quest 5 at Rs. 5,666 - and all three are exactly ten per cent off. A flat ten across a brand's whole showing usually means a policy rather than a clearance. The identical Downshifter 14 appears in the men's chapter at the identical Rs. 4,406. We have not run in it and no rating was returned by the feed.

• Price: Rs. 4,406 (stated MRP Rs. 4,895)
• Key detail: Rs. 4,406 at 10% off - the shallowest badge and a model name you can research
• Discount: 10% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 489
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Shallowest badge, researchable name
• Buying logic: a name you can look up

One thousand one hundred and twenty rupees, eighty-six per cent off a stated Rs. 7,999. This chapter exists because of a single count: not one of the 80 men's sports shoe listings we pulled names a performance property. Not cushioning, not support, not breathability, not weight, not drop. Fifteen listings across the whole 395 mention a mesh upper, and we have deliberately not counted mesh among the 33 spec-naming listings, because mesh is a material rather than a claim about what the shoe does - a mesh upper is common to running shoes costing Rs. 800 and Rs. 8,000. That is the difference this card is here to draw. The eighty-six per cent is genuine arithmetic off a stated figure; whether the stated figure means anything is a separate question, and the answer is suggested by the fact that seventeen RED TAPE listings claim MRPs from Rs. 5,799 to Rs. 9,399 and all sell between Rs. 812 and Rs. 1,488. Buy at Rs. 1,120 if Rs. 1,120 is your budget for a walking or gym shoe. Do not buy because the page says you are saving Rs. 6,879, because that saving is measured against a number nothing in this feed is sold at. We have not worn it and AJIO returned no rating and no review count for it.

• Price: Rs. 1,120 (stated MRP Rs. 7,999)
• Key detail: 86% off a stated Rs. 7,999 - the title names a material, mesh, and nothing else
• Discount: 86% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 6,879
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Mesh is a material, not a spec
• Buying logic: material, not function

Four thousand four hundred and six rupees, ten per cent off a stated Rs. 4,895, which is to the rupee what the women's Downshifter 14 in the previous chapter costs and carries the same ten per cent badge. We have seated both, in both aisles, because that symmetry is a small but real piece of information on a grid this noisy: where a brand runs a flat percentage across its range, the men's and women's listings of the same model do not diverge, and a shopper can stop looking for a better price in the other aisle. It also sets a boundary on the rest of this chapter. Rs. 4,406 is roughly four times the Rs. 1,120 RED TAPE listing and about seventy-five per cent above the Rs. 2,500 ASICS one, and no title in the chapter offers a single performance property to justify any of those gaps. What you are actually buying with the extra money is a named model with published specifications elsewhere and, for many people, a fit they already know. That is a legitimate reason to spend it and a poor reason to assume the shoe is better at anything specific, which we are in no position to establish - we have not run in any of these. AJIO's search response returned no rating and no review count for this listing, as for all 395.

• Price: Rs. 4,406 (stated MRP Rs. 4,895)
• Key detail: Rs. 4,406 - the identical price and badge as the women's Downshifter 14 listing
• Discount: 10% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 489
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Same shoe, same price, both aisles
• Buying logic: flat pricing, both aisles

Two thousand five hundred rupees, exactly fifty per cent off a stated Rs. 4,999. We close the men's chapter here because it sits between the two poles the chapter has been describing and shows what the middle of this rack looks like. Gel-Contend 4B+ is a model name that Asics documents on its own channels and that has been reviewed independently, so as with the Nike listing, the name is the route to a specification the AJIO grid does not print. The listing itself says running shoes and nothing more. A round fifty per cent off a round Rs. 4,999 is the kind of number that recurs in this pull - twenty-one listings sit at exactly fifty per cent - and a clean half is more often a merchandising decision than a coincidence of arithmetic. Asics shows up six times across the 395 rows, from Rs. 2,500 to Rs. 5,309, at discounts between thirty and sixty-one per cent, so this is at the affordable end of its range here. What we cannot tell you is whether it suits your foot, your gait or your mileage, because we have not worn it, because AJIO returned no rating and no review count, and because those are things a search feed has never been able to establish. Try the size before you commit and check the return window.

• Price: Rs. 2,500 (stated MRP Rs. 4,999)
• Key detail: Rs. 2,500 at exactly 50% off - a named model at the midpoint of the men's shoe rack
• Discount: 50% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 2,499
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Named model at the midpoint
• Buying logic: the middle of the rack

Three hundred and forty-nine rupees, thirteen per cent off a stated Rs. 399. Three listings out of 395 use the phrase moisture control and this is one of them. Whether a training top moves sweat away from the skin is close to the only thing that separates one plain synthetic tee from another in use, and it is the property this grid almost never mentions. We are not endorsing the claim - it is Decathlon's own wording, we have not worn the shirt, and we have no way to test wicking. We are noting that it is present at all, and that it is attached to a Rs. 349 garment carrying a thirteen per cent badge rather than to something at seventy per cent off. Two Kiprun Run 100 tees appear here at Rs. 349 each, one stating moisture control and one stating breathable, which is a rare case of a brand differentiating two near-identical listings on function rather than on print. The Rs. 50 gap between price and stated MRP is also the sort of modest claim that is easy to believe, in a pull where the median listing claims a sixty per cent discount. Fit, length, how it survives washing and whether the fabric holds odour are not things a feed can tell you. AJIO returned no rating and no review count for it.

• Price: Rs. 349 (stated MRP Rs. 399)
• Key detail: Rs. 349 - one of three listings in 395 whose title says moisture control
• Discount: 13% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 50
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Three listings in 395 say this
• Buying logic: the claim that matters

Two hundred and ninety-nine rupees, twenty-five per cent off a stated Rs. 399. Stretchable is a modest claim and we are not going to pretend it is a technical specification - it tells you the fabric has some give, which most gym tops do. But it is a claim about how the cloth behaves rather than about its neckline, and on this grid that is enough to put it in the minority group of 33. Two near-identical Decathlon listings appear at this exact price, one under the Domyos sub-brand and one under Nyamba, both stating stretchable, both Rs. 299 off Rs. 399. Where two listings differ only by sub-brand and share a price, there is no decision to make and you should buy whichever is available in your size. The wider point for this chapter is where the specifications live on AJIO's activewear grid: they are overwhelmingly on cheap garments from one retailer. Of the 33 spec-naming listings in the whole pull, fourteen are Decathlon, and Decathlon's entire showing here runs from Rs. 299 to Rs. 2,499. Knowing what you are buying is not something you have to pay a premium for on this page - it is mostly something you get from one brand. We have not worn it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 299 (stated MRP Rs. 399)
• Key detail: Rs. 299 - the cheapest listing here that states any fabric behaviour at all
• Discount: 25% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 100
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Cheapest stated-fabric top
• Buying logic: cheap, and it says something

Five hundred and ninety-nine rupees, thirty-seven per cent off a stated Rs. 949. We counted 68 gym-wear listings, a large share of them leggings and tights, and this is the only one whose title states a fabric property. The rest are described as high-rise, mid-rise, ankle-length, ribbed, printed, colourblock, flared, with insert pockets or with an elasticated waist. Every one of those is useful - waist height and pockets are real buying criteria - but none of them is about the cloth, and for leggings the cloth is the thing people complain about: whether it goes sheer when you squat, whether it holds shape, whether the waistband rolls. None of the 68 titles addresses any of that, including this one, which only claims stretch. So the honest reading is that the best-specified legging on this grid is still barely specified. Stretchable and a stated 500-series model code is what you get. Thirty-seven per cent is a middling badge in a pull where the median is sixty and where thirty-seven listings sit at eighty per cent or above. If you want a legging and want to know what it is made of, the product page may carry more than the grid does - we did not open 395 of them - and that is where we would look before ordering. We have not worn this and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 599 (stated MRP Rs. 949)
• Key detail: Rs. 599 - the only legging in 68 gym-wear listings whose title states stretch
• Discount: 37% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 350
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The only legging that states stretch
• Buying logic: one in 68 says it

Three hundred and forty-nine rupees, sixty-five per cent off a stated Rs. 999. Put this next to the Decathlon Kiprun tee two cards above and you have this whole page in one comparison. Both are Rs. 349. Both state a fabric claim in the title - dry fit here, moisture control there. One is presented as thirteen per cent off Rs. 399 and the other as sixty-five per cent off Rs. 999. The customer pays the same money either way, and the only difference is the size of the number the page invites you to feel good about. That is not a criticism of this shirt, which may well be perfectly good; it is the reason we would ignore the percentage and compare the price. Flingr has five listings in this pull, four of them tees at Rs. 349 off stated MRPs of Rs. 999, and two of the four state dry fit while two say only long sleeves and a neckline. Dry fit as a phrase is generic in Indian activewear listings and is not a measured standard, so treat it as a directional claim rather than a specification. We have not worn it, we cannot verify the wicking, and AJIO's search response returned no rating and no review count for it, as for every other listing in the pull.

• Price: Rs. 349 (stated MRP Rs. 999)
• Key detail: Rs. 349 - the same price as the Decathlon tee, off a stated MRP two and a half times higher
• Discount: 65% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 650
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Same price, bigger claimed saving
• Buying logic: same price, louder badge

One hundred and twenty rupees, seventy per cent off a stated Rs. 399, and it is the cheapest garment on this page by a distance. The title states a regular fit, a round neck and the word running - a shape, a neckline and a use case - and nothing about the fabric. At Rs. 120 that is arguably fine: at this price you are buying a tank top to sweat in and not a piece of technical kit, and expecting a specification would be unreasonable. We have seated it partly to mark the bottom of the range and partly because PERFORMAX is AJIO's own activewear label and shows up 29 times in this pull, which makes it one of the two or three brands a shopper in this aisle will see most. Its listings run from Rs. 120 to Rs. 1,049 and its badges from ten to eighty per cent, so the label spans the entire grid on both axes. Two of its track pants listings, in the next chapter, are among the only 33 in 395 that name a finish, so this is not a brand that never specifies - it simply does not here. What we cannot tell you is how a Rs. 120 tank wears, washes or lasts, because we have not handled it, and AJIO returned no rating and no review count for it.

• Price: Rs. 120 (stated MRP Rs. 399)
• Key detail: Rs. 120 - the cheapest garment on this page, and the title states no fabric property
• Discount: 70% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 279
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Cheapest garment on the page
• Buying logic: the bottom of the range

One hundred and fifty rupees, seventy-five per cent off a stated Rs. 599. We pulled 68 men's track pants listings and exactly two of them name a fabric finish. Both are PERFORMAX, both use the word Fastdry, and this is the cheaper - the other is in the same house label at Rs. 719 with a ten per cent badge. Every one of the other 66 is described by rise, fit, waistband, stripes, pockets or print. Mid-rise, straight, elasticated drawstring waist, insert pockets, contrast tipping: those are the vocabulary of this rack, and none of them tells you whether the fabric is cotton, polyester, brushed fleece or a blend, which for track pants is the difference between something you can train in and something you can only lounge in. Fastdry is AJIO's own house wording rather than a measured standard, and we are quoting it, not endorsing it - we have not worn these and cannot test drying time. At Rs. 150 the question of whether the claim holds is a Rs. 150 question. The seventy-five per cent badge is off a stated Rs. 599 that we have no way to verify, and the same house label sells other track pants at Rs. 315, Rs. 419, Rs. 719 and Rs. 899 in this pull. No rating and no review count were returned.

• Price: Rs. 150 (stated MRP Rs. 599)
• Key detail: Rs. 150 - one of only two track pants in 68 whose title names a finish, Fastdry
• Discount: 75% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 449
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Two track pants in 68 name a finish
• Buying logic: two in 68 name a finish

One hundred and seventy-five rupees, ninety-three per cent off a stated Rs. 2,499. Of all 395 listings we read on August 3, this carries the largest percentage, and it is the natural place to test the argument this page has been making. What does the title tell you? Graphic print, elasticated drawstring waist, track pants. A pattern, a waistband and a garment type. No fabric, no weight, no finish, no intended use. The claimed saving is Rs. 2,324, which is fifteen times the price you actually pay, and the same brand's sweatshirt in the next chapter is ninety per cent off the same stated Rs. 2,499. When one brand's stated MRP is identical across different garments and the selling prices are Rs. 175 and Rs. 250, the stated MRP is a constant rather than a price. We are describing what is in AJIO's feed and drawing no conclusion about the brand's intentions. As a purchase, Rs. 175 for track pants is very cheap and might be exactly right for lounging or for a spare pair - EYEBOGLER has four listings in this pull between Rs. 175 and Rs. 429, all above sixty-six per cent off. Just buy it because Rs. 175 is worth it to you, not because the page says Rs. 2,499. We have not handled it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 175 (stated MRP Rs. 2,499)
• Key detail: 93% off a stated Rs. 2,499 - the deepest badge of all 395 listings in the pull
• Discount: 93% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 2,324
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The deepest badge in the pull
• Buying logic: the largest badge here

Eight hundred and seventy-nine rupees, twenty per cent off a stated Rs. 1,099. Three listings of the U.S. Polo Assn. OELP6 cotton straight track pant appear in this pull, with the same title and the same stated Rs. 1,099, selling at Rs. 879, Rs. 890 and Rs. 912 - twenty, nineteen and seventeen per cent off respectively. They are different colour variants under one style code, which is ordinary retail practice and not an error, but the practical effect on a shopper is real: the same garment can cost you thirty-three rupees more depending on which colour you land on, and a grid sorted by discount will put them in an order that has nothing to do with the shoe you want. It is worth a second look at the colour options before you add to cart. What makes this card useful beyond the pricing quirk is that the title names the fabric: cotton. That is one of very few fabric words anywhere in the 68 track pants listings, and for track pants it is decision-relevant - cotton behaves quite differently in a gym from a polyester blend, and which you want depends entirely on what you are doing in them. Twenty per cent is a modest badge on a modest MRP, which is a more believable pairing than most on this rack. We have not worn it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 879 (stated MRP Rs. 1,099)
• Key detail: Rs. 879 - one of three OELP6 listings at Rs. 879, Rs. 890 and Rs. 912 off the same Rs. 1,099
• Discount: 20% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 220
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: One style code, three prices
• Buying logic: check the colour first

Two hundred and fifty rupees, ninety per cent off a stated Rs. 2,499. This chapter has the starkest count on the page: of the 40 men's sweatshirt listings we pulled, not one names a fabric, a weight, a fleece type or any performance property. The vocabulary is entirely fit and print - regular fit, oversized fit, slim fit, relaxed fit, loose fit, crew neck, typographic print, graphic print, colourblocked. For a sweatshirt, the two things that decide whether you like it are the weight of the fabric and whether it is brushed inside, and neither appears anywhere in the 40. This listing is the extreme case: ninety per cent off, and the title tells you it is typographic, oversized and a sweatshirt. Note also that the stated Rs. 2,499 is the identical figure this brand's track pants carry in the previous chapter, where the selling price is Rs. 175 rather than Rs. 250. One stated MRP covering two different garments at two different prices tells you what that figure is doing. Rs. 250 for a sweatshirt is cheap and may be a perfectly good purchase for a cool evening; we simply cannot tell you what you are getting, and neither can the listing. We have not handled it, and AJIO's search response returned no rating and no review count.

• Price: Rs. 250 (stated MRP Rs. 2,499)
• Key detail: 90% off a stated Rs. 2,499 - the deepest badge of the 40 sweatshirt listings
• Discount: 90% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 2,249
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: Ninety per cent, zero information
• Buying logic: no fabric stated anywhere

One thousand two hundred and sixty-four rupees, sixty per cent off a stated Rs. 3,159 - which is exactly the median discount of the 362 listings in this pull that name no performance property. It is five times the Rs. 250 sweatshirt two cards up, and its title contains precisely the same categories of information: a brand, a logo, a regular fit and a crew neck. No fabric, no GSM, no fleece description. So the case for spending Rs. 1,264 rather than Rs. 250 cannot be made from this grid, and we are not going to manufacture one. It has to rest on things outside the listing: a brand whose sizing you already know, a resale of familiarity, an expectation about make quality built from previous purchases. Those are real reasons and we are not dismissing them. They are simply not facts AJIO is showing you here. The wider point of this chapter is that the information gap does not close as you spend more. In the bra chapter, price and specification were at least loosely related through Decathlon and Puma; in sweatshirts, the Rs. 250 listing and the Rs. 1,264 one are equally silent. We have not handled either. No rating and no review count were returned for any of the 395 listings we pulled.

• Price: Rs. 1,264 (stated MRP Rs. 3,159)
• Key detail: Rs. 1,264 - the dearest sweatshirt we seated, at the median badge for the category
• Discount: 60% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 1,895
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The brand-priced sweatshirt
• Buying logic: spending more buys no spec

Six hundred and sixteen rupees, fifteen per cent off a stated Rs. 725, and we close the page here because that pair of numbers is the quietest thing in the whole pull. Rs. 725 is not a round number, it is not shared with a dozen other listings, and it sits close enough to the selling price that it is easy to believe someone has actually paid it. Compare the Rs. 2,499 that appears as a stated MRP on both an EYEBOGLER sweatshirt selling at Rs. 250 and an EYEBOGLER track pant selling at Rs. 175, and you can see the difference between an MRP and a reference figure. TECHNOSPORT behaves this way across its whole showing here: eleven listings, every one between ten and fifteen per cent off, from Rs. 287 to Rs. 674 - a house label that prices things at what it wants for them and does not perform a discount. It still tells you nothing about the fabric, which is the honest limit of this page: even the brand with the most straightforward pricing on the grid is describing a slim fit and a sweatshirt. If you want to know what you are buying in this aisle, the specification is on the product page or nowhere, and the search grid you shop from is not going to give it to you. We have not handled it and no rating was returned.

• Price: Rs. 616 (stated MRP Rs. 725)
• Key detail: Rs. 616 at 15% off Rs. 725 - the most believable MRP in the sweatshirt rack
• Discount: 15% off a stated MRP, which is Rs. 109
• Rating: none published - AJIO's search response returned no rating or review count for any of the 395 listings
• Role: The most believable MRP here
• Buying logic: a believable number