Sixty-four Myntra listings read on one day. Eleven thermals are badged exactly 0% and not a single track pant is - and the most-rated garment in the read advertises nothing.
We read two Myntra menswear category pages the same way on 31 October 2026 - 32 men's thermals and 32 men's track pants - and the discount badge behaves like a different quantity on each. The thermals run a median badge of 11% against a median stated MRP of 1.12 times the selling price; the track pants run 58% and 2.40x. Eleven thermals are badged exactly 0%, and not one track pant is. The garment with the largest rating pool in the whole read advertises no discount at all, and the deepest badge on either shelf sits on a listing with no rating.
Every price below was pulled from Myntra on October 31, 2026 and checked against the MRP on the listing. Stack them with the live codes on our Myntra coupons page, which the deals desk re-verifies daily.
Six listings that frame the whole read - the cheapest tile on either shelf, the thermal shelf's deepest badge at 74%, and the track-pant tiles sitting squarely on their own shelf's 2.40x median claim.
Rs. 332 against a stated Rs. 665, badged 50% — 1,781 ratings
Why it earned its spot it is the floor of both shelves and a useful anchor: everything else on this page is measured against the fact that a thermal top here starts at Rs. 332.
Rs. 386 against a stated Rs. 1,499, badged 74% — 14 ratings
Why it earned its spot at 74% it is the single deepest discount on the thermal side, and it comes from the label with the smallest rating pool of the ten rated thermals.
Rs. 405 against a stated Rs. 1,999, badged 80% — 585 ratings
Why it earned its spot it opens the track-pant side at a badge no thermal in the read comes close to, and it carries a duplicate-listing fingerprint worth knowing about.
Rs. 412 against a stated Rs. 999, badged 59% — 233 ratings
Why it earned its spot it sits on the track-pant shelf's median claim almost exactly, which makes it the cleanest single illustration of what an ordinary tile looks like there.
Rs. 416 against a stated Rs. 999, badged 58% — 1,801 ratings
Why it earned its spot a large, real rating pool on the track-pant side shows the deep badges are not confined to listings nobody has bought.
Rs. 431 against a stated Rs. 769, badged 44% — 462 ratings
Why it earned its spot it closes the opening chapter between the two extremes and shows the thermal shelf does contain ordinary discounting, just not much of it.
Jockey, T.T., BODYCARE INSIDER, Lux Cozi and ONN set the stated MRP equal to the price, or within Rs. 66 of it. The house with the biggest rating pool in the read advertises no discount at all.
Rs. 499 against a stated Rs. 565, badged 12% — 40 ratings
Why it earned its spot it opens the chapter on the innerwear houses, and a 12% badge on a Rs. 66 reduction is what an honest small discount looks like in this data.
Rs. 517 against a stated Rs. 517, badged 0% — no rating published
Why it earned its spot it is the first of the eleven 0% tiles and the clearest statement of what the thermal shelf's convention actually is.
Rs. 529 against a stated Rs. 529, badged 0% — no rating published
Why it earned its spot two listings from one house twelve rupees apart, both at 0%, shows the zero is a pricing policy and not a coincidence of timing.
Rs. 545 against a stated Rs. 699, badged 22% — 589 ratings
Why it earned its spot it marks the ceiling of what the established innerwear houses in this read will badge, which is the boundary the whole page turns on.
Rs. 560 against a stated Rs. 560, badged 0% — 74 ratings
Why it earned its spot the highest star average among the seated thermals sits on a tile with no discount at all, which is worth saying plainly.
Rs. 563 against a stated Rs. 625, badged 10% — 33 ratings
Why it earned its spot it is the median tile of this house's five listings and shows the small, literal discounts the thermal shelf actually runs.
Rs. 599 against a stated Rs. 630, badged 5% — 57 ratings
Why it earned its spot the smallest non-zero badge on the thermal shelf, and the clearest example of a reference figure that is doing almost no work.
Rs. 625 against a stated Rs. 625, badged 0% — 34 ratings
Why it earned its spot one house running 0%, 10%, 10% and 12% across four tiles shows how narrow the band is once a seller declines to inflate the anchor.
Rs. 734 against a stated Rs. 815, badged 10% — 28 ratings
Why it earned its spot the house's price range moves by nearly 50% and its badge does not move at all, which is what a literal reference figure looks like.
Rs. 799 against a stated Rs. 799, badged 0% — 5,423 ratings
Why it earned its spot the most-reviewed garment across both shelves advertises no discount whatsoever, which is the single fact this page is built to put in front of a shopper.
Deep badges on claims of two to six times the selling price, including the read's largest rating pools and its largest stated MRP - Rs. 4,999 on a Rs. 849 garment.
Rs. 405 against a stated Rs. 1,999, badged 80% — 585 ratings
Why it earned its spot it opens the track-pant side at a badge no thermal in the read comes close to, and it carries a duplicate-listing fingerprint worth knowing about.
Rs. 412 against a stated Rs. 999, badged 59% — 233 ratings
Why it earned its spot it sits on the track-pant shelf's median claim almost exactly, which makes it the cleanest single illustration of what an ordinary tile looks like there.
Rs. 416 against a stated Rs. 999, badged 58% — 1,801 ratings
Why it earned its spot a large, real rating pool on the track-pant side shows the deep badges are not confined to listings nobody has bought.
Rs. 464 against a stated Rs. 1,499, badged 69% — 3,133 ratings
Why it earned its spot it is the second-largest rating pool on the track-pant side and sits near the top of that shelf's badge range, which is the opposite of the thermal shelf.
Rs. 526 against a stated Rs. 1,429, badged 63% — 4,819 ratings
Why it earned its spot the second-largest rating pool in the entire 64-listing read, and it is on the deep-badge side, which keeps the comparison honest in both directions.
Rs. 643 against a stated Rs. 1,399, badged 54% — no rating published
Why it earned its spot the same label as pick 10 with a similar badge and no rating pool at all, which separates the badge from the evidence cleanly.
Rs. 685 against a stated Rs. 1,399, badged 51% — 316 ratings
Why it earned its spot it is the shallowest badge on the track-pant side that still clears 50%, which shows where that shelf's floor really sits.
Rs. 849 against a stated Rs. 4,999, badged 83% — no rating published
Why it earned its spot the largest claim and the deepest badge in the read close the page, and the listing behind them publishes no rating at all.
First, never compare a badge across the two shelves. A 22% thermal and a 58% track pant are percentages of reference figures set by different conventions; in this read the thermal houses' deepest badge was 22% and the track pants' median was 58%. Second, divide the stated MRP by the price. Around 1.0x to 1.3x means the badge is a literal reduction you could almost watch happen; 3x to 6x means it mostly reports the seller's choice of anchor. Third, read the rating count before the badge. 15 of the 64 listings here publish no rating at all, and they include both of the deepest-badged track pants. Fourth, check whether the same figures appear twice - two listings in this read share a price, a stated MRP, a badge and an identical 585-rating pool. Prices change without notice and cart-level coupons are not visible in this data, so check the live listing before buying.
| Product | Sale price | MRP | Discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| DIXCY SCOTT Rs. 332 — the cheapest tile in the read, badged 50% | Rs. 332 | Rs. 665 | 50% |
| UZARUS Rs. 386 — the thermal shelf's deepest badge, 74% | Rs. 386 | Rs. 1,499 | 74% |
| Imsa Moda Rs. 405 — 80% off, and listed twice | Rs. 405 | Rs. 1,999 | 80% |
| PROGENY Rs. 412 — 2.4x claimed, badged 59% | Rs. 412 | Rs. 999 | 59% |
| dockstreet Rs. 416 — 1,801 ratings behind a 58% badge | Rs. 416 | Rs. 999 | 58% |
| Dollar Ultra Rs. 431 — 1.78x, the thermal middle | Rs. 431 | Rs. 769 | 44% |
| The Modern Soul Rs. 464 — 3,133 ratings, badged 69% | Rs. 464 | Rs. 1,499 | 69% |
| Lux Cozi Rs. 499 — Rs. 66 off a Rs. 565 claim | Rs. 499 | Rs. 565 | 12% |
| T.T. Rs. 517 — 0% off, no rating published | Rs. 517 | Rs. 517 | 0% |
| HRX Rs. 526 — 4,819 ratings, the read's second-largest pool | Rs. 526 | Rs. 1,429 | 63% |
| T.T. Rs. 529 — a second 0% tile from the same house | Rs. 529 | Rs. 529 | 0% |
| Van Heusen Rs. 545 — 22%, the shallow end of the branded set | Rs. 545 | Rs. 699 | 22% |
| BODYCARE INSIDER Rs. 560 — 0%, and 4.66 stars | Rs. 560 | Rs. 560 | 0% |
| Lux Cozi Rs. 563 — 10%, a Rs. 62 reduction | Rs. 563 | Rs. 625 | 10% |
| ONN Rs. 599 — 5%, a Rs. 31 reduction | Rs. 599 | Rs. 630 | 5% |
| Lux Cozi Rs. 625 — the same house at exactly 0% | Rs. 625 | Rs. 625 | 0% |
| HRX Rs. 643 — 54%, and no rating on this one | Rs. 643 | Rs. 1,399 | 54% |
| Status Quo Rs. 685 — 2.04x, badged 51% | Rs. 685 | Rs. 1,399 | 51% |
| Lux Cozi Rs. 734 — the dearest of its five, badged 10% | Rs. 734 | Rs. 815 | 10% |
| Jockey Rs. 799 — 5,423 ratings and a 0% badge | Rs. 799 | Rs. 799 | 0% |
| COTTON CLIQUE Rs. 849 — Rs. 4,999 claimed, badged 83% | Rs. 849 | Rs. 4,999 | 83% |
Each selling price, stated MRP, discount badge, star average and rating count on this page came from the product data myntra.com itself serves, read on 31 October 2026, logged out, from India, with nothing bought. The two category pages were men's thermals (32 listings) and men's track pants (32 listings). Every median, range and count quoted is computed over all 64, not over the 21 seated here.
The whole argument of this page is a comparison between two Myntra category pages, so it only holds if both were read identically. Both were pulled on the same day, by the same tool, logged out, from the same location, with no filters or sorting applied, and both returned 32 listings. Neither shelf was sampled to favour the comparison - the picks seated here include the deepest badge on the thermal side (74%) and the shallowest on the track-pant side (51%).
This page is ordered so the pattern is visible: the two shelves side by side first, then the eleven 0% listings, then the deep-badge track-pant tiles. Nothing is seated because it is a good deal and nothing is dropped for being a bad one. Both ends of the price range (Rs. 332 and Rs. 849) and both ends of the badge range (0% and 83%) are described.
15 of the 64 listings in this read publish no star average and no rating count at all, and six of those are seated here. Those cards carry no rating pill and say so in words. No rating has been inferred, estimated, averaged or imported from anywhere else. Where two listings report an identical rating count and star average - as the two Imsa Moda track pants at Rs. 405 do - that is reported as what the published data shows, not as proof the garments are identical.
We reproduce the reference price each listing prints and compute badges and multiples from it. The largest in this read is Rs. 4,999 on a Rs. 849 track pant. Nothing here asserts that any product ever sold at its stated MRP, that any stated MRP is false or improper, or that Myntra or any brand or seller named has done anything wrong. Setting a reference price, and declining to set one, are both ordinary retail practice, reported here as published fact.
This is a price read. No thermal or track pant has been ordered, delivered, worn, washed or measured, and no claim is made about insulation, thermal rating, GSM, cotton content, shrinkage, pilling, fit or how long anything lasts. Phrases such as "Super Combed Cotton", "Brushed Fabric" and "Ribbed" are the listings' own words, reproduced and not verified.
Across 64 listings read on 31 October 2026 from Myntra's own listing data, the 32 men's thermals ran Rs. 332 to Rs. 799, median Rs. 544, and the 32 men's track pants ran Rs. 405 to Rs. 1,399, median Rs. 633. The cheapest listing in the read was a Rs. 332 thermal t-shirt badged 50%; the dearest seated here a Rs. 849 track pant badged 83%.
Because the two shelves use different pricing conventions, not because one is a better deal. The 32 thermals run a median badge of 11% and a median stated MRP of 1.12 times the selling price; the 32 track pants run a median badge of 58% and a median stated MRP of 2.40x. Eleven of the 32 thermals are badged exactly 0% - houses such as Jockey, T.T. and BODYCARE INSIDER set the stated MRP equal to the price, so there is no percentage to display. Not one of the 32 track pants is at 0%. Compare the selling prices, not the badges.
In this read, the established innerwear houses. Jockey's three listings are all badged 0%, T.T.'s four are all 0%, and BODYCARE INSIDER's two are both 0%. Lux Cozi runs a median 10% across five listings and ONN 5% across two. The deepest badge carried by any of these houses in the read is 22%, from Van Heusen Innerwear. None of this is a criticism of them - a price with no inflated anchor behind it is arguably the more useful number. It does mean a discount sort hides them.
Not on this shelf. The largest rating pool in the entire read - a Jockey thermal with 5,423 ratings at 4.54 stars - carries a 0% badge, while the thermal shelf's deepest badge, 74%, sits on a listing with 14 ratings. 15 of the 64 listings publish no rating at all, including the two deepest-badged track pants (83% and 82%). A rating count is evidence about a garment; a badge is arithmetic on a reference figure the seller chose.
It happens in this read and it is worth checking for. Two Imsa Moda listings both sell at Rs. 405 against the same stated Rs. 1,999, both badged 80% - and both report exactly 585 ratings at exactly 3.69 stars. The product names differ slightly and the photographs differ. We do not claim the two are the same garment; Myntra lists per colourway and style code. What the published data shows is that an identical rating pool sits behind both tiles, so reading the review count on one does not independently confirm the other.




















