Twenty-four pairs read on 18 September. Twenty-seven of the 71 listings we pulled state the identical Rs. 1,999 - and charge anything from Rs. 301 to Rs. 1,999 against it.
We read Myntra's sunglasses listings on 18 September 2026 and seated 24 of the 71 that returned both a price and an MRP. One number does most of the explaining: 27 of those listings, from eleven unrelated brands, state exactly Rs. 1,999 as their MRP, and the prices charged against it run from Rs. 301 to Rs. 1,999. Sixty-one of the 71 sell under Rs. 1,000. The frames at the loud end are mostly fine. The savings are arithmetic over a number the seller chose.
Every price below was pulled from Myntra on September 18, 2026 and checked against the MRP on the listing. Stack them with the live codes on our Myntra coupons page, which the deals desk re-verifies daily.
Twenty-seven of the 71 listings we read state exactly Rs. 1,999 as their MRP, and they come from eleven different brands. Against that one number the selling prices run from Rs. 301 to Rs. 1,999 - a spread of 6.6 times. Two of those listings are from the same Myntra in-house label.
Rs. 301 for a Funglasses rectangle frame, against the same stated Rs. 1,999 that twenty-six other listings state.
Why it earned its spot The floor of the shelf, and the best-evidenced pair at the bottom of it.
Rs. 305 for a Mast & Harbour frame against a stated Rs. 1,999 - and another Mast & Harbour listing sells at Rs. 1,999 against the identical MRP.
Why it earned its spot One label, one stated MRP, two prices six and a half times apart.
Rs. 315 for a HAYDEN haiza square frame - 4.0 from 780 ratings, against the shelf's standard Rs. 1,999.
Why it earned its spot A real sample at a price where most listings have none.
Rs. 372 for a Roadster yellow-lens wayfarer - 4.2 from 907 ratings, 81 per cent off the club price.
Why it earned its spot The best-known name at the cheap end, with a sample to match.
Rs. 398 for a LEGEND EYEWEAR wayfarer - 4.4 from 880 ratings, the strongest pairing under Rs. 500.
Why it earned its spot The best combination of average and sample size anywhere under Rs. 500 in this read.
Rs. 477 for a Provogue men's frame - 4.0 from 964 ratings, the second-largest sample in this chapter.
Why it earned its spot A brand old enough to have had shops, priced like one that never did.
Rs. 574 for a WROGN square frame - 4.2 from 600 ratings, still against the same stated Rs. 1,999.
Why it earned its spot A recognised fashion name whose badge sits mid-table rather than at the top.
Rs. 699 for a Vincent Chase polarised wayfarer - a 65 per cent badge, from the brand behind Lenskart's own shops.
Why it earned its spot The first listing in this chapter whose seller has price tags of its own to answer to.
Rs. 811 for a second Vincent Chase frame - 4.4 from 1,026 ratings and a 59 per cent badge, the lowest of the 27.
Why it earned its spot More ratings than anything else in the chapter, and the least inflated claim.
The same Mast & Harbour label that sells at Rs. 305 also sells this frame at Rs. 1,999 - the club's MRP, charged in full.
Why it earned its spot The control listing for the whole chapter: the club's number, charged as a price.
Six listings whose rating counts run from 491 to 6,881, including the most-rated pair on the shelf. Some of them also state polarisation rather than plain tinting, which is the only specification here worth paying for.
Rs. 346 for an Artrue aviator - 4.4 from 717 ratings, against a stated Rs. 1,599 rather than the usual Rs. 1,999.
Why it earned its spot The best-rated aviator in the read, and a brand that prints three different MRPs.
Rs. 397 for a HAYDEN haiza round frame - 4.5 from 723 ratings, against a stated Rs. 699 rather than Rs. 1,999.
Why it earned its spot Almost the same price as the club listings, with a third of the fiction attached.
Rs. 536 for a Woggles round frame with a stated polarised lens - 4.2 from 491 ratings.
Why it earned its spot One of only three listings in the read that state polarised rather than merely tinted.
Rs. 735 for a Carlton London polarised rectangle frame - 4.3 from 689 ratings, at a 59 per cent badge.
Why it earned its spot A department-store brand, a stated polarised lens, and a badge that stays under 60 per cent.
Rs. 799 for a Voyage round frame - 4.4 from 6,881 ratings, by far the largest count on this shelf.
Why it earned its spot Six thousand eight hundred and eighty-one ratings is more evidence than anything else here has.
Rs. 990 for a Voyage black oval frame - 4.4 from 2,294 ratings, against the same stated Rs. 3,000.
Why it earned its spot The second-largest sample in the read, at the top of the sub-Rs. 1,000 band.
Two Woggles listings publishing the identical rating pool at prices Rs. 12 apart, and then the top of the shelf - where the discount claims get modest and honest, and the published feedback disappears almost entirely.
Rs. 536 for a Woggles rectangle frame publishing 4.1 from 1,073 ratings - a count our pull also found on a second Woggles listing.
Why it earned its spot The cheaper half of a pair of listings that share one set of ratings.
Rs. 548 for the second Woggles rectangle listing - identical name, identical stated Rs. 1,312, identical 4.1 from 1,073.
Why it earned its spot Seated only to show the reader the duplicate, and what it costs to land on the wrong one.
Rs. 699 for an AUGEN frame - 2.6 from 7 ratings, the only average below 3.5 in the whole read.
Why it earned its spot The one listing here where the published feedback is actively negative.
Rs. 891 for a LensKandy clear-lens frame - the smallest real badge in this chapter, and no rating published.
Why it earned its spot The cheapest illustration of the page's second problem: no evidence at any price.
Rs. 1,358 for MANGO square sunglasses - a 35 per cent badge, the kind of number a brand with stores can print.
Why it earned its spot The control from outside the marketplace: a shop-window brand claiming a third, not four-fifths.
Rs. 1,452 for a SUNGLASSIC hexagon frame - 4.1 from 15 ratings, at a 42 per cent badge.
Why it earned its spot A four-figure price supported by fifteen ratings.
Rs. 1,469 for a Musk Eyewear round frame against a stated Rs. 1,499 - a 2 per cent discount, and no rating.
Why it earned its spot The most honest number on the page, attached to the least evidence.
Rs. 1,501 for a Lee Cooper frame at a 37 per cent badge - the top price in this read, and no published rating.
Why it earned its spot The ceiling of the shelf, priced like a brand with distribution and evidenced like one without.
First: ignore the badge and read the selling price on its own. On a shelf where 27 listings from eleven brands state the identical Rs. 1,999, the crossed-out number carries no information about any individual frame - the same in-house label uses it to justify Rs. 305 on one listing and to charge Rs. 1,999 on another. Second: buy where the ratings are. The Rs. 799 Voyage has 6,881 of them and the Rs. 398 LEGEND EYEWEAR wayfarer has 880 at a 4.4 average; at the top of this shelf, three of the four listings we seated above Rs. 1,300 publish nothing at all. Third: check for a shared pool. Open the frame in a second colour or a near-identical listing, and if the rating count matches to the digit - as it does on the two Woggles rectangles here, 1,073 each at Rs. 536 and Rs. 548 - you are looking at one pool and possibly one product, so compare both prices before tapping. Fourth: if glare is the actual problem, pay for polarisation and nothing else. Only three seated listings state it, the cheapest at Rs. 536; everything else on this page states tinting and UV protection, which are not the same specification.
| Product | Sale price | MRP | Discount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Funglasses rectangle, 1,478 ratings | Rs. 301 | Rs. 1,999 | 85%% |
| Mast & Harbour, 85% claimed | Rs. 305 | Rs. 1,999 | 85%% |
| HAYDEN haiza square, 780 ratings | Rs. 315 | Rs. 1,999 | 84%% |
| Roadster wayfarer, 907 ratings | Rs. 372 | Rs. 1,999 | 81%% |
| LEGEND EYEWEAR wayfarer, 4.4 from 880 | Rs. 398 | Rs. 1,999 | 80%% |
| Provogue, 964 ratings | Rs. 477 | Rs. 1,999 | 76%% |
| WROGN square, 600 ratings | Rs. 574 | Rs. 1,999 | 71%% |
| Vincent Chase polarised, 65% badge | Rs. 699 | Rs. 1,999 | 65%% |
| Vincent Chase, 1,026 ratings | Rs. 811 | Rs. 1,999 | 59%% |
| Mast & Harbour, no discount at all, Rs. 1 | Rs. 1,999 | Rs. 1,999 | none% |
| Artrue aviator, 717 ratings | Rs. 346 | Rs. 1,599 | 78%% |
| HAYDEN haiza round, MRP Rs. 699 | Rs. 397 | Rs. 699 | 43%% |
| Woggles round, polarised | Rs. 536 | Rs. 2,171 | 75%% |
| Carlton London polarised, 689 ratings | Rs. 735 | Rs. 1,795 | 59%% |
| Voyage round, 6,881 ratings | Rs. 799 | Rs. 3,000 | 73%% |
| Voyage oval, 2,294 ratings | Rs. 990 | Rs. 3,000 | 67%% |
| Woggles rectangle, pooled count | Rs. 536 | Rs. 1,312 | 59%% |
| Woggles rectangle, same 1,073 ratings | Rs. 548 | Rs. 1,312 | 58%% |
| AUGEN, 2.6 from 7 ratings | Rs. 699 | Rs. 999 | 30%% |
| LensKandy, 26% badge, no rating | Rs. 891 | Rs. 1,200 | 26%% |
| MANGO square, a shop-price MRP, Rs. 1 | Rs. 1,358 | Rs. 2,090 | 35%% |
| SUNGLASSIC hexagon, 15 ratings, Rs. 1 | Rs. 1,452 | Rs. 2,499 | 42%% |
| Musk Eyewear, a 2% badge, Rs. 1 | Rs. 1,469 | Rs. 1,499 | 2%% |
| Lee Cooper, no rating published, Rs. 1 | Rs. 1,501 | Rs. 2,399 | 37%% |
It is the variable that makes this shelf legible. Twenty-seven of the 71 listings we pulled state exactly Rs. 1,999 as their MRP, and they come from eleven different brands - Artrue, Dervin, FUNGLASSES, HAYDEN haiza, LEGEND EYEWEAR, Mast & Harbour, Provogue, Roadster, Rozzetta craft, Vincent Chase and WROGN. Against that one identical figure the selling prices run Rs. 301 to Rs. 1,999. A number that eleven unrelated sellers print on twenty-seven different frames is a convention of the category, not a measurement of any one of them.
Mast & Harbour, one of Myntra's own in-house labels, has a listing at Rs. 305 against a stated Rs. 1,999 and another at Rs. 1,999 against the identical stated Rs. 1,999. Same seller, same stated MRP, two selling prices 6.6 times apart, read in the same session. That pair is the control group for every percentage on this page, and it is the reason we do not describe any badge here as a saving.
Two Woggles rectangle listings in this read publish 4.1 from exactly 1,073 ratings each, at Rs. 536 and Rs. 548, with the same stated MRP of Rs. 1,312. An identical count to the digit means one pool, not two verdicts - either one product listed twice or a platform pooling feedback across a style family, which Myntra does routinely. Both are seated here so the duplicate is visible rather than described, and both cards say so.
Twenty-five of the 71 listings in our pull publish no rating and no rating count whatsoever, and the concentration is at the top of the shelf: of the four listings seated above Rs. 1,300, three publish nothing. We print a rating pill only where a listing carries at least 20 ratings, so the Mast & Harbour's 4.2 from five and the SUNGLASSIC's 4.1 from fifteen appear in the text and never as a pill.
Nothing on this page was worn, measured or lens-tested. 'UV protected', 'polarised', every frame material and every model code are the sellers' own listing text, quoted as such and never as a finding. Polarisation is the one specification here that would justify paying more, and exactly three seated listings state it - two Woggles and one Vincent Chase - which is why we name them rather than assume it anywhere else.
Not as savings. In our 18 September 2026 read, 27 of the 71 listings state exactly the same MRP, Rs. 1,999, across eleven unrelated brands - Artrue, Dervin, FUNGLASSES, HAYDEN haiza, LEGEND EYEWEAR, Mast & Harbour, Provogue, Roadster, Rozzetta craft, Vincent Chase and WROGN. Against that one figure the selling prices run Rs. 301 to Rs. 1,999. The clearest single case is Mast & Harbour, one of Myntra's own labels, which sells one frame at Rs. 305 with an 85 per cent badge and another at Rs. 1,999 with no badge at all, both against the identical stated Rs. 1,999. Displaying a stated MRP is lawful; it is simply not evidence of a saving.
On published evidence, the LEGEND EYEWEAR wayfarer at Rs. 398 - 4.4 from 880 ratings, the best average-and-sample combination under Rs. 500 in our read. If you want the largest crowd behind your purchase, the Voyage round frame at Rs. 799 carries 6,881 ratings at 4.4, far more than anything else on the shelf. And if glare rather than fashion is the problem, the Vincent Chase polarised wayfarer at Rs. 699 is the one we would buy: Lenskart's house brand, a stated polarised lens, and the smallest discount claims in the whole Rs. 1,999 group.
Because Myntra pools feedback across a style family rather than attaching it to a single listing - and because the same product is sometimes listed twice. Our pull caught it here: two Woggles rectangle listings both publish 4.1 from exactly 1,073 ratings, both state an MRP of Rs. 1,312 and both claim a polarised lens, at Rs. 536 and Rs. 548. An identical count to the digit means one pool, not two independent verdicts. The practical consequence is small but real: check both listings, because the cheaper one is not always the one search shows you first.
If your problem is reflected glare - off a wet road, water, or a car bonnet - yes, because polarisation filters that specific horizontally-reflected light in a way that a darker tint does not. If you simply want the world dimmer, a UV protected tint does the job. Only three of the listings seated here state polarisation: two Woggles frames at Rs. 536 and Rs. 548, and the Vincent Chase at Rs. 699, with the Carlton London at Rs. 735 also stating it. Those are the sellers' own listing claims and we have not lens-tested any of them; after delivery you can check by holding the lens to a phone screen and rotating it.
Because the catalogue turns over faster than feedback accumulates, and because the expensive end sells in smaller numbers. Twenty-five of the 71 listings in our pull publish no rating and no rating count, and they cluster at the top: of the four listings we seated above Rs. 1,300, three publish nothing - the Musk Eyewear at Rs. 1,469, the Lee Cooper at Rs. 1,501 and the LensKandy at Rs. 891. That is the shelf's real trade-off. The cheap end has thousands of ratings and fictional MRPs; the dear end has credible MRPs and almost no evidence.























