Uniqlo vs AJIO Discount 2026: No MRP Shown vs 70% Off Every Tile

We read 214 Uniqlo India listings on 17 October 2026 from Uniqlo's own storefront — logged out, from India, with nothing bought — and the first thing to report is a number that is missing rather than present.

152 of the 214 listings, about 71%, publish a single price and nothing else. No struck-through figure, no claimed list price, and therefore no discount percentage anywhere on the tile. Where a second figure does appear — 62 listings — it is Uniqlo's own earlier shelf price under a limited-offer label, not a manufacturer's MRP, and those badges run 11% to 75% with a median of 33.5%.

On the same morning we read AJIO and Myntra. AJIO's median men's formal shirt was badged 70% off; Myntra's 64%; and 29 AJIO bag listings were badged exactly 70% because their price is the stated MRP multiplied by 0.3. The point of this page is not that one approach is better. It is that the number most shoppers use to compare shelves does not exist on one of them.

Every one of the 214 prices in this read ends in 90, without a single exception, and they bunch hard. Forty listings sit at exactly Rs. 1,490; thirty at Rs. 1,990; twenty-eight at Rs. 2,990. The table is the shelf.

The 214 listings resolve to 142 distinct product names, the remainder being colourways of something already on the list, so the catalogue is narrower than the listing count suggests. The mix by section was 77 unisex, 51 women's, 42 men's, 26 kids' and 18 baby.

What the clustering means in practice: on this shelf, price is a tier rather than a per-product figure. Two garments at Rs. 1,490 are in the same tier, not necessarily comparable in any other way — and nothing on either tile tells you what either one 'should' cost, because no second figure is printed.

Read the fourth column across and the badge stops looking like a measurement. On one shelf it is absent from 71% of listings. On another it is 70% on 29 listings because the selling price is defined as exactly 0.3 of the stated MRP — arithmetic, not a markdown. On a third it has a median of 64% with ten tiles landing on exactly 70%.

None of these is improper and this page says so plainly. Printing a manufacturer's MRP beside a selling price is a long-standing and lawful Indian retail convention; so is printing one price and leaving it there. What does not survive the comparison is the habit of treating the percentage as a measure of value across sites, because the three shelves are not computing it from comparable things.

The fifth column is the one with a real winner. Myntra published a rating on 51 of 64 listings with pools up to 232,259. Uniqlo published one on 62 of 214, with counts between 1 and 20. AJIO published none at all, on either of the two shelves we read. If you want to know what other buyers thought before spending, the three sites differ far more on that than on price.

Compare rupees, never percentages. A Uniqlo tee at Rs. 1,490 carries no badge; a marketplace tee at Rs. 450 may carry a 70% one. The second number tells you nothing about the first.

Remember what Uniqlo's own second figure is when it appears. On the 62 discounted listings, the struck figure is Uniqlo's earlier shelf price under a limited-offer label — a Rs. 1,490 graphic tee at Rs. 590, for instance — not a claimed manufacturer's list price. That makes it a different kind of claim from an MRP, and arguably an easier one to check, since the earlier price was on the same site.

Treat the ratings on all three sites with the sample size in view. Twenty ratings is twenty. Zero is zero. Two hundred thousand is a different object entirely, and only one of these three shelves had any.

And take every figure here as one morning's reading. Uniqlo runs limited offers that change weekly, the Indian shelves re-rank continuously and personalise results, and prices change without notice. Nothing on this page is a judgement about fabric, construction, fit or whether any garment is worth its price — nobody here wore anything.